|
|
Post by DinosaurMichael on Apr 8, 2012 8:12:49 GMT -5
I think they should. I have the complete season on DVD and I think they should of made a another season. If they were to make it. These are what I would of like to see.
Tyrannosaurus Rex vs Triceratops
Spinosaurus vs Carcharodontosaurus
Velociraptor vs Protoceratops
Megalania vs Marsupial Lion
Acrocanthosaurus vs Paluxysaurus
Smilodon Gracilis vs Titanis
Woolly Mammoth vs Elasmotherium
Tarbosaurus vs Therizinosaurus
Amphicyon Ingens vs Daeodon
Tylosaurus vs Pack of Ginsu Sharks
Postosuchus vs Placerias
Ice Age Extinction
What do you guys think though? Yes or no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Canid Cetus Aves on Apr 8, 2012 10:29:00 GMT -5
Hell ya! Even thought the information on the show was crap, it was certainly entertaining!
|
|
|
|
Post by DinosaurMichael on Apr 8, 2012 11:41:35 GMT -5
Hell ya! Even thought the information on the show was crap, it was certainly entertaining! I've watched all the episodes and I didn't find anything inaccurate. If so, which stuff is it? |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimategrid on Apr 8, 2012 12:26:27 GMT -5
Hell ya! Even thought the information on the show was crap, it was certainly entertaining! I've watched all the episodes and I didn't find anything inaccurate. If so, which stuff is it? The fact that they have an entire behavioural plan for Nanotyrannus, when it's not even certain that it's a unique species (most likely being a juvenile T.rex) Saying that Megalodon could "taste" with it's denticles, when in reality it, like any other shark, cannot. Having dinosaurs with rotating palms, (which is impossible). Even stating Tyrannosaurus first appeared 90mya which again is inaccurate. That's just the main stuff I noticed, there's probably more. But to be fair, the series was entertaining, and I'd like them to make more episodes. However George Blasing stated they won't be doing that any time soon because the series didn't make enough money. |
|
|
|
Post by Canid Cetus Aves on Apr 8, 2012 12:42:10 GMT -5
Hell ya! Even thought the information on the show was crap, it was certainly entertaining! I've watched all the episodes and I didn't find anything inaccurate. If so, which stuff is it? 40 foot Allosaurus? 30 foot Ceratosaurus? And that's just to start. Arctodus throwing a freaking American Lion into a hole? LOLZ! |
|
|
|
Post by DinosaurMichael on Apr 8, 2012 13:38:23 GMT -5
Ultimategrid and Canid Cetus Aves: I think it sucks. I do think they should make more, but oh well about the 40 foot Allosaurus and 30 foot Ceratosaurus. I hear it could've been possible only it wouldn't be their average size. Also you got a point about the hole.
|
|
|
|
Post by Anomonyous on Apr 8, 2012 14:26:32 GMT -5
George Blasing isn't the most popular in the paleontology department, I hear.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyrannosaurus on Apr 8, 2012 18:26:47 GMT -5
I don't judge Dinosaur George based on the show's shortcomings. Often interveiws with paleontologists are edited to make it look like they said something they didn't; svpow.com/2009/12/15/lies-damned-lies-and-clash-of-the-dinosaurs/Discovery Channel's older Dino documentaries are the best ones. When Dinosaurs Roamed America and Dinosaur Planet, for example. Hell ya! Even thought the information on the show was crap, it was certainly entertaining! I've watched all the episodes and I didn't find anything inaccurate. If so, which stuff is it? Well then you don't know much about Dinosaurs. They said in one episode that Dinosaurs lived 55 million years ago... they had a whole episode about Dromaeosaurus fighting T. rex, despite Dromaeosaurus living 10 million years before T. rex. The whole show was full of that stuff. Enteraining? Sure. Accurate? No. |
|
|
|
Post by DinosaurMichael on Apr 8, 2012 18:32:18 GMT -5
I don't judge Dinosaur George based on the show's shortcomings. Often interveiws with paleontologists are edited to make it look like they said something they didn't; svpow.com/2009/12/15/lies-damned-lies-and-clash-of-the-dinosaurs/Discovery Channel's older Dino documentaries are the best ones. When Dinosaurs Roamed America and Dinosaur Planet, for example. I've watched all the episodes and I didn't find anything inaccurate. If so, which stuff is it? Well then you don't know much about Dinosaurs. They said in one episode that Dinosaurs lived 55 million years ago... they had a whole episode about Dromaeosaurus fighting T. rex, despite Dromaeosaurus living 10 million years before T. rex. The whole show was full of that stuff. Enteraining? Sure. Accurate? No. I haven't notice until now and I actually do know lots about dinosaurs. Just watched a video of it and I was surprise I actually never notice the 55 million years ago. Now I do. Also about the fact dromosaurus didn't co-exist with dinosaurs. I didn't realize that either. So now that I think of it. It is enteraining, but inaccurate. |
|
Venomous Dragon
Archeon
The Varanid
The Ora, King of The Lizards.
Posts: 2,037
|
Post by Venomous Dragon on Apr 8, 2012 22:24:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Deinobrontornis on Apr 17, 2012 15:18:21 GMT -5
I've watched all the episodes and I didn't find anything inaccurate. If so, which stuff is it? 40 foot Allosaurus? 30 foot Ceratosaurus? And that's just to start. Arctodus throwing a freaking American Lion into a hole? LOLZ! Oh fuck! You fall prey to this ignorant assumption too? For your information, the American lion vs. giant short-faced bear is actually based off of an American lion skeleton found IN A CAVE! I'm sure a fifteen foot long, twelve foot tall (on all fours) bear is rather ridiculous, but everything else was pretty accurate. |
|
|
|
Post by thunderhawk on May 14, 2012 14:42:23 GMT -5
The show was heavily sensationalized and the accuracy was debatable, but that's just History Channel these days isn't it. It didn't have a whole lot in terms of substance, and was basically a dinosaur cartoon (albeit a beautifully rendered cartoon) but I couldn't bring myself to not like it.
|
|
