|
|
Post by Dinopithecus on Dec 31, 2013 18:38:40 GMT -5
Therizinosaurus might actually have a quite a weight advantage...
|
|
|
|
Post by rhino on Dec 31, 2013 19:22:17 GMT -5
I'm still favoring Therizinosaurus due to its greater reach. It could badly slash up the tarbo's face before the latter gets close enough to bite.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dinopithecus on Dec 31, 2013 22:08:13 GMT -5
The user theropod stated on another forum that given Tarbosaurus isn't that huge, Therizinosaurus could definitely hold a significant weight advantage (possibly as much as 100% bigger). If that's the case, I might have to change my vote.
|
|
Godzillasaurus
Invertebrate
Reptile (both extant and extinct) and kaiju enthusiast
Posts: 314 
|
Post by Godzillasaurus on Jan 1, 2014 9:29:46 GMT -5
Take such confident size estimates with a grain of salt. It is better to use ranges for size than use absolutes. But I will say that tyrannosaurids were poorly-adapted for tackling prey that much larger than themselves, as their crushing morphology implies reliance more-so on smaller animals that can be damaged more easily by blunt force as opposed to broad ripping.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dinopithecus on Jan 1, 2014 10:15:12 GMT -5
Confident size estimates? How about you talk to him and I guess blaze then (I think there is the same match on WoA)?
|
|
