|
Post by jumbo1 on Jun 14, 2012 9:07:04 GMT -5
based on the info Anom and Commie posted on elephant vs t-rex thread, I say the rexes win but one will die. Still though a 19 ton elephant.... geez.....
|
|
|
Post by Super Communist on Jun 14, 2012 10:30:56 GMT -5
I feel that this would end in a draw.
The mammoth would be able to kill both rexes, but die due to extensive injuries, assuming tyrannosaurus had the ability to cooperate with others of course.
|
|
|
Post by jumbo1 on Jun 22, 2012 5:04:42 GMT -5
Ok I have no idea why I previously voted for the t-rexes. Anyway, mammoth wins. Not a whole lot they can do against a 17 tonne elephant.
|
|
|
Post by rhino on Apr 9, 2013 1:02:15 GMT -5
Who thinks the mammoth would win? Speak up. I do. The mammoth is MUCH heavier, stronger, taller, better armed, and far more intelligent than any t-rex and can easily keep them at bay. T.Rex was an incredibly unagile animal that took seconds to make a 180 degree turn. Even if it did outmaneuver the mammoth, the mammoth's sides are too wide and flat and covered with thick fur for the t.rex to wrap his jaws around.
|
|
|
Post by crazyfish on Apr 10, 2013 23:44:14 GMT -5
Two T. rexes (not T-rexes) shouldn't have much trouble taking down a Steppe mammoth.
|
|
|
Post by Cr1TiKaL on Apr 12, 2013 15:18:09 GMT -5
I vote for the Tyrannosaurs here. I vote Songhua River Mammoth over 1 Tyrannosaurus, but because there is 2 Tyrannosaurs here, they will be too much for the mammoth.
|
|
|
Post by rhino on Apr 15, 2013 15:23:34 GMT -5
Is there proof T.Rex cooperated?
If not, they'd likely turn on each other and be killed by the mammoth 1 by 1
|
|
|
Post by Dinopithecus on Oct 20, 2013 18:10:52 GMT -5
The Songhua River Mammoth was actually synonymous with the Steppe Mammoth who was around 12 tonnes. The combined weight of the dinosaurs should be around the same size. Still, I see no evidence that T.rex hunted cooperatively. For know, probably the steppe mammoth.
And I see that the unagile and intelligence arguments are being used again here.
|
|
Godzillasaurus
Invertebrate
Reptile (both extant and extinct) and kaiju enthusiast
Posts: 314
|
Post by Godzillasaurus on Oct 20, 2013 18:35:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Just some guy on Jul 15, 2014 12:35:06 GMT -5
Ok, assuming they really could do this cooperatively Credit goes to blaze on Carnivora for the combined screenshots two Sue-sized specimens would win nearly all the time. Hell, one would win about half the time against the 10.5t specimen. The combined weight of the tyrannosaurs is 16.8 tonnes, ~24% heavier than the large mammoth and ~60% heavier than the small mammoth. Also, the tyrannosaurids would certainly be far more agile than the elephant and if maximum speed really matters, then that will come to their benefit too; it will be questionable if the mammoth could effectively catch the dinosaurs. The tyrannosaurids would tear this proboscidean apart ~95±2% of the time.
|
|
|
Post by rhino on Aug 3, 2014 2:21:17 GMT -5
Changed my mind after that picture. The t-rexes win.
|
|