|
Post by Carcharadontosaurus on Dec 17, 2013 17:14:02 GMT -5
Purussaurus kills deinosuchus rugosus, but imo toss up against d. riograndensis.
|
|
Godzillasaurus
Invertebrate
Reptile (both extant and extinct) and kaiju enthusiast
Posts: 314
|
Post by Godzillasaurus on Dec 17, 2013 19:20:02 GMT -5
I don't know about you guys, but I've interpreted Purussaurus' skull as one that could absorb a lot of stress, given what it looks like. I don't know who wins this. They seem to be the same size. Its very stout shape would have been very resistant in life (to both vertical and lateral stress). But deinosuchus would have had a resistant skull itself, as I have already stated; its snout was much more elongate, but its rostrum was still very robust and would have had no problem with lateral and vertical stress alike (not to mention how its mandible was wide at its base as well, telling us that it was more than capable of delivering a massively powerful bite. Deinosuchus, too, was more than capable of crushing, with very thick and robust dentition that would have no problem doing so (it had more elongate teeth in the front part of its snout that were designed much like thick spikes for piercing into the hides of large animals and resisting stress; and it had very bulbous dentition at the rear best adapted for crushing. But they were all built similarly; regardless of length or function, they were all built very robustly and would have had no issues dealing with such crushing forces). It was very much similar to modern crocodiles in terms of tooth morphology
|
|
batcheno
Invertebrate
Leopard kills caiman
Posts: 186
|
Post by batcheno on Dec 4, 2016 11:33:01 GMT -5
I am pretty much shure purussaurus can win
|
|